Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Berpendekatan STEM untuk Mengembangkan Kecakapan Abad 21 Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Fisika

Suyanto Suyanto

Abstract


In 21st century learning, students are asked to improve their competencies to improve their ability to collaborate, think critically, communicate and think creatively. Teachers must be able to develop these 4 (four) skills in students so that they can keep up with current developments. One of them is developing students' 21st century skills with the Project Based Learning learning model with a STEM approach. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with an "One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design" research design. There was a significant increase in critical thinking skills from a score of 2.48 to 2.78 (scale 1 -3), collaboration skills from 2.44 to 2.75, creative thinking from 2.3 to 2.8 and communication skills from 2.34 to 2.76. The Project Based Learning learning model with a STEM approach is able to develop students' 21st century skills.


Keywords


21st century skills, STEM, Physics learning, Project Based Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. (2002). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (edisi Revisi Cetakan Ketiga). Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School science and mathematics, 112(1), 3-11.Hanover Research (2011). K-12 STEM education overview.

Brown, R., Brown, J., Reardon, K., & Merrill, C. (2011). Understanding STEM: current perceptions. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(6), 5.

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunity. Arlington, VI: National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) Press.

Fan, S. C. C., & Ritz, J. (2014). International views of STEM education. PATT-28 Research into Technological and Engineering Literacy Core Connections, 7-14.

Joyce, B., & Marsha, W. (1992). Models of Teaching. 4 Ed. USA: Allyn and Bacon.

Karyana, S. (2018). Abad 21 dan Filosofi STEM. SEAMEO Regional Centre for QITEP in Science.

Poppy & Reza. (2018). Filosofi Pendidikan STEM. Handout : Pelatihan Integrasi STEM dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 In Service – 1

Roberts, A. (2012). A justification for STEM education. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 74(8), 1-5.

Roberts, A. & Cantu, D. (2012). Applying STEM instructional strategies to design and technology curriculum. Technology Education in the 21st Century, (73), 111-118.

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2010). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.

Wiggins, G., and McTighe, J. (2011). The Understanding by Design guide to creating highquality units. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/sch.v4i2.10681

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Suyanto Suyanto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher:
UNIVERSITAS INDRAPRASTA PGRI

Address: Department of Physics Education | (Kampus A) TB. Simatupang, Jl. Nangka Raya No.58 C, RT.5/RW.5, Tj. Bar., Kec. Jagakarsa, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12530, Indonesia | (Kampus B) Jl. Raya Tengah No. 80, Kel. Gedong, Kec. Pasar Rebo, Jakarta Timur 13760, Indonesia
Phone: +62 (021) 7818718 – 78835283 | Close in sunday and public holidays in Indonesia
E-mail: kampus@unindra.ac.id

 

Creative Commons License
Schrodinger Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.