Teacher’s Technology Integration ELT Based on SAMR Model in Writing Skill
Abstract
This study is aimed to know the technology categories integrated by the teacher and classify the teacher’s technology integration level. Descriptive qualitative is used to describe the result of this study. The data is collected through interview and observation at SMA N 1 SENTOLO. It is focused on the teaching of writing. the subject of this research were 2 teacher. The data were transformed into descriptive text and interviewed transcripts. The data analysis used reduction data, the data display, and conclusion drawing or verification. The data validation used triangulation of technique of collecting data and triangulation of source of data.
The source of data taken from interview . Based on the result of finding and discussion, it is found that the teacher integrated more than four technology categories which are word processing, spreadsheet software, organizing and brainstorm, multimedia, and web resources. The teacher integrated those technologies in teaching listening, reading and writing skill. While the activities is analysed based on SAMR model to know the teacher’s technology integration .
The result shows that the teacher is on the augmentation level in teaching writing skill, which the teacher uses word processing with additional functions like spell check, cut, and paste the documents. Therefore, the teacher is classified on passing the substitution level, because the teacher is on the augmentation level, which integrates technology as a direct tool substitute, with functional improvement.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Andrew, Elizabeth H. (2016). Doctoral Dissertation: “Teacher Pedagogy to Develop Student Writing through the Integration of text-To-Speech Technology”. Australia: Flinders University.
Beisel, Carolyn Anne. (2017). Doctoral Dissertation: “New or Novice Teacher Integration of Mobile Learning Instruction”. Walden: Walden University.
Barnaba H Yudha, & Rahmawan D Andi. (2019). English writing errors of non-English Departement Students. Journal of English Taching and Learning Issues Volume 2 2019 page 131-142,. DOI:10.21043/jetli.v2i2.5740
Cennamo, Katherine S., John D. Ross, Peggy A. (2010). Ertmer.Technology Integration for Meaningful Classroom Use a Standards-Based Approach. USA: Cengage Learning.
Chell, Geraldine, Sean Dowling, (2018). “Substitution to Redefinition: The Challenges of Using Technology” (http://www.researchgate.net, accessed on May 03, 2018)
Chin Lin, Grace Hui– Paul Shih-chieh Chien. (2018). An Introduction to English Teaching: A Textbook for English Educators (http://ebooks.lib.ntu.edu.tw, accessed on September 30, 2018)
District 220 SAMR Activity Scale for Technology Opportunities, (www.bsd220tech.blogspot.sg, accessed on April 29, 2018)
Dokstader, Joelene. (1999). “Teachers of the 21st century know the what, why, and how of technology integration” T.H.E Journal. Vol. 26 Issue 6. 73-76.
Eady, Michelle J. - Lori Lockyer. “Tools for Learning: Technology and Teaching Strategies”. Paper presented at learning to teach in the Primary School Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
Hamilton, Boni. (2015). Integrating Technology in the Classroom Tools to Meet the Needs of Every Student.USA: ISTE.
Hennesy. (2005). technology integration offers benefits for English language teaching and learning (ELTL).
Hockly, Nicky. (2013). “Technology for the Language Teacher: Mobile Learning” ELT Journal. Vol.67. 80-84.
Kamijo, Marta Mercedes. (2017). “Evaluating Mobile Learning Activities” Tesol Connections. Argentina.
Kihoza, Patrick, Irina Zlotnikova, Joseph Bada, Khamisi Kalegele. (2016). ”Classroom ICT integration in Tanzania: Opportunities and challenges from the perspective of TPACK and SAMR models”. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT). Vol. 12, Issue 1. 107-128.
Lobo, Alejandra Glangiulio, Rocio Lara Jimenez. (2018). “Evaluating Basic Grammar Projects, Using the SAMR Model”. Letras 61, 2017. (http://dx.doi.org/10.15359/rl.1-61.5, accesses on June 13, 2018)
Neuman, W. Lawrence. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. United States of America : Pearson New International Edition.
Park, Joseph J. (2014). “ The Use of Profesional Learning Networks and Technology Integration” . Papper presented for requirement for 61-683.
Philips, Michael. (2015). “ Digital Technology Integration.” In hendersen , M Romeo, G. (ED). Teaching and dDigital Technologies: Big Issues and Critical Questions. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Floris, F. D., & Renandya, W. A. (2017). Transforming the teaching of listening and reading using the SAMR Model. Modern English teacher, 26(4), 41-44.
Harendita, M. (2013). Why resist? A closer look at Indonesian teachers’ resistance to ICT. International Journal of Indonesian Studies, 1,42-57.
Jude, L. T., Kajura, M. A., & Birevu, M. P. (2014). Adoption of the SAMR model to asses ICT pedagogical adoption: A case of Makerere University. International Journal of e-Education, e- Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 4(2), 106.
Kirkland AB. (2014). Models for Technology Integration in the Learning Commons.School Libraries in Canada 32 (1) 14–18.
Liu, P.-H. E., & Tsai, M.-K. (2013). Using augmented-reality-based mobile learning material in EFL English composition: An exploratory case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), E1–E4. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01302.x
Machmud, K. (2011). The integration of technology in a decentralized curriculum setting: The Case of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Instruction in Gorontalo, Indonesia. United State of America: Ohio University
Puentedura, R. R. (2015). SAMR: A brief introduction. Retrieved October 2, 2019.
Romrell, Danae, Lisa C. Kidder, Emma Wood. (2013). “The SAMR Modelas a Framework for Evaluating m-Learning”. Evaluating m-Learning. United State of America: Idaho State University.
Sandanayake, T. C. (2019). Promoting open educational resources-basedblended learning: Revista de universidad y sociedad delconocimiento. International Journal of Educational Technology inHigher Education, 16(1), 1-16.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0133-6
Hennesy. (2005). technology integration offers benefits for English language teaching and learning (ELTL).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/jedu.v1i3.5983
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Published by:
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Jakarta, Indonesia
Address: TB. Simatupang, Jl. Nangka Raya No.58 C, RT.5/RW.5, Tj. Barat., Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan, Provinsi DKI Jakarta, 12530, Indonesia
Phone: +62 (021) 7818718 – 78835283 | Close in sunday and public holidays in Indonesia
Work Hours: 09.00 AM – 04.00 PM Best hours to visit: From 9 am to 11 am or after 3 pm. The busiest times are between 11 am and 3 pm.
JEdu: Journal of English Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.